Fish and Game Commission Adopts Emergency Closure for
Lingcod in Ocean Waters
California Fish and Game Commission
October 23, 2000
CONTACT: Robert Treanor
Fish and Game Commission (916) 653-4899
L.B. Boydstun
Marine Region, (916) 653-6281
SAN DIEGO - Responding to concerns that the harvest of a
popular West Coast favorite will exceed its allowable catch
for 2000, the California Fish and Game Commission took
emergency action to close all ocean-based fishing for
lingcod statewide during the final two months of the year.
The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has indicated
they will compliment the state action by restricting
fishing for lingcod from three to 200 miles offshore.
Lingcod has been declared "overfished" by the NMFS
and a rebuilding plan has been developed by the Pacific
Fishery Management Council (PFMC). Fishing for lingcod was
closed this year in Southern California during January and
February and in central California during March and April
to protect this highly prized bottom fish species, which
grow to over 30 pounds in weight. Restrictions have been
applied to fisheries from Cape Flattery in northern
Washington, to the California/Mexico border with the aim of
recovering the population to a maximum level of sustainable
harvest.
The emergency regulation goes into effect as soon
as it is reviewed by the Office of Administrative Law and
filed with the Secretary of State. The process normally
takes 10 days. The regulation will remain in effect only
through December, however. After this, new regulations
aimed at protecting lingcod and other important marine
bottom feeding species are expected to be in place.
In a related matter, the Commission decided against
closing fishing for rockfish in Southern California during
the same period as the lingcod closure.
The projected overage in catch of bocaccio rockfish
- the object of the rockfish closure - was not so
compelling as it was for lingcod, according to Robert
Treanor, the Commission's Executive Director. For bocaccio,
the final harvest could easily be less than projected if
anglers continued to concentrate on other marine finfish
species during the final months of the year. For lingcod,
the harvest would still be over the target if catches are
even half the DFG prediction, said Treanor.
Both closure recommendations were made by the
Department of Fish and Game (DFG) and follow multi-year
rebuilding plans that have been developed for lingcod and
bocaccio rockfish by PFMC, said LB Boydstun of the DFG's
Intergovernmental Affairs Office. Boydstun estimated
optimum yield for both species will be exceeded before the
end of the year based on recent years' landing patterns,
and places both species at less than 10 percent of their
unfished population levels.
This is a very critical time for both species and
we need to get started on the right foot in our efforts to
restore the populations to healthy levels, Boydstun said.
The Commission's decision to close the lingcod
fishery is expected to have a minor economic impact on the
state's ocean recreational fishery because lingcod are
usually caught when fishing for rockfish, and are only
occasionally the object of individual fishing trips. The
proposed rockfish closure would have been more severe, said
Boydstun.
The Commission's action on Oct. 20 was not its
first effort to help restore numbers to the failing
fisheries. In addition to two-month closure periods for
both species in the southern and central portions of the
state, the Commission also lowered the number of rockfish
and lingcod individual anglers and divers may catch and
keep each day and increased the minimum size limit for
lingcod. The decision followed a similar action in November
1999 by the PFMC, which includes representatives from
Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, the Coastal Tribes
and the NMFS. The reductions were in response to state and
federal fisheries scientists' concerns for the overall
health of lingcod and rockfish stocks and the continued
declines in West Coast population numbers.
In 1999, assessments of bocaccio off California and
lingcod off Washington, Oregon, and California determined
that the stocks in those waters had declined by more than
90 percent from their unfished population levels. The
declines occurred during the past two decades and have
resulted in major fishery reductions in the affected areas,
both recreational and commercial. |